Current:Home > reviewsRuling keeps abortion question on ballot in South Dakota -InvestPioneer
Ruling keeps abortion question on ballot in South Dakota
View
Date:2025-04-27 12:29:02
A state court judge’s ruling Monday keeps an abortion-rights question on the November ballot in South Dakota.
Judge John Pekas dismissed a lawsuit filed by an anti-abortion group, Life Defense Fund, that sought to have the question removed even though supporters turned in more than enough valid signatures to put it on the ballot.
“They have thrown everything they could dream up to stop the people of South Dakota from voting on this matter,” Adam Weiland, co-founder of Dakotans for Health, said in a statement after the ruling. “This is another failed effort by a small group opposed to giving women the option to terminate pregnancies caused by rape and incest or to address dangerous pregnancies affecting the life and health of women.”
Republican Rep. Jon Hansen, who is a co-chair of the Life Defense Fund, and a lawyer for the group did not immediately return messages from The Associated Press on Monday.
South Dakota is one of 14 states now enforcing a ban on abortion at every stage of pregnancy, a possibility the U.S. Supreme Court opened the door to in 2022, when it overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the nationwide right to abortion.
The amendment supported by Dakotans for Health would bar the state from regulating “a pregnant woman’s abortion decision and its effectuation” in the first trimester, but it would allow second-trimester regulations “only in ways that are reasonably related to the physical health of the pregnant woman.”
Since Roe was overturned, all seven statewide abortion-related ballot measures have gone the way abortion-rights groups wanted them to.
This year, similar questions are on the ballots in five states, plus a New York equal rights question that would ban discrimination based on “pregnancy outcomes,” among other factors.
Advocates are waiting for signatures to be verified to get questions on the ballot this year in four more states, including Nebraska, where there could be competing questions on abortion rights before voters.
veryGood! (1967)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- 300 Scientists Oppose Trump Nominee: ‘More Dangerous Than Climate Change is Lying’
- The Truth About Queen Camilla's Life Before She Ended Up With King Charles III
- Gas stove debate boils over in Congress this week
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Patient satisfaction surveys fail to track how well hospitals treat people of color
- Hunger advocates want free school meals for all kids. It's tough sell in Congress
- The top White House monkeypox doc takes stock of the outbreak — and what's next
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Maria Menounos Recalls Fearing She Wouldn't Get to Meet Her Baby After Cancer Diagnosis
Ranking
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Poll: One year after SB 8, Texans express strong support for abortion rights
- CDC recommends new booster shots to fight omicron
- Science Teachers Respond to Climate Materials Sent by Heartland Institute
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Gwyneth Paltrow’s Daughter Apple Martin Pokes Fun at Her Mom in Rare Footage
- Striving to outrace polio: What's it like living with the disease
- Long COVID and the labor market
Recommendation
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
Science Teachers Respond to Climate Materials Sent by Heartland Institute
Global Coal Consumption Likely Has Peaked, Report Says
You Won't Be Sleepless Over This Rare Photo of Meg Ryan
Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
As Snow Disappears, A Family of Dogsled Racers in Wisconsin Can’t Agree Why
EPA Science Advisers Push Back on Wheeler, Say He’s Minimizing Their Role
Life expectancy in the U.S. continues to drop, driven by COVID-19